Birthdate: September 16th, 1979 (32 years old)
|
| |||
FlowersInHisHair Member Profile  Member Since: 2008-10-11 Last Power Points used: 2011-01-22 • Available: now Max Power Points: 1 • Get More Power Points Now Comments |
Navigation
Member Stats Rank: 534 Rating:  27 star pointsTop 15 Videos: 3 Votes Received: 619 Average Votes Per Video: 14.07 Votes Cast: 1228 Comments Posted: 1347 • browse Comments Applauded: 12 Sifted Videos: 27 Profile Views: 24678 Highest Ranked Comments Member's Highest Rated Videos | ||
Add comment
Skillful Videos Submitted by FlowersInHisHair
View Mobile VideoSift
bookmarklet - page width: fixed - loose
Copyright © Sift Partners, Inc. 2006-2012
Terms and Conditions - Contact Us - VideoSift Staff
page generated on web1 in 0.8961 seconds
Powered by Varo CMS by Rommel Santor
bookmarklet - page width: fixed - loose
Copyright © Sift Partners, Inc. 2006-2012
Terms and Conditions - Contact Us - VideoSift Staff
page generated on web1 in 0.8961 seconds
Powered by Varo CMS by Rommel Santor
Well, quite!
Is the original not on Funny Or Die?
In reply to this comment by VoodooV:
In reply to this comment by FlowersInHisHair:
I'm a new bronze-star member, so sorry if flagging your video dead wasn't the right thing to do. I just thought it the best way to draw it to your urgent attention, since it's #1 vid and all.
no worries. I found a different embed. We'll see how long that lasts until youtube squashes that too.
It is, but I'm not able to use the embed code there. I think only the higher ranked people can.
I'm a new bronze-star member, so sorry if flagging your video dead wasn't the right thing to do. I just thought it the best way to draw it to your urgent attention, since it's #1 vid and all.
no worries. I found a different embed. We'll see how long that lasts until youtube squashes that too.
Congrats on that bronze star!
Thanks, chaps!
As you can see, there is currently a 6 month delay between me putting a video on my list of ones to promote and then getting to it
You're only one vid away from bronze, too.
p.s. Is this your lego marble run one?
http://pann.nate.com/video/217375042
In reply to this comment by FlowersInHisHair:
Thank you for promoting the Powaqqatsi clip I submitted. It's a great piece; I only wish I could have been at the concert! Anyway, thanks again, it's nice to see it published.
In reply to this comment by oritteropo:
*promote
In reply to this comment by FlowersInHisHair:
Where was Adele?
In reply to this comment by FlowersInHisHair:
If anything, this video makes me consider how photo-editing software is used to cover up for bad and/or lazy photography (particularly lighting, which is most of the "before" shots is generally very poorly thought-out), not just to modify the appearance of the subject.
I went back and listened to it again. Right after the guy says "coke" you can hear "it's a pepsi" real low.
I am back to thinking this is subliminal advertising.
Jaded, jaded, jaded, I am.
In reply to this comment by FlowersInHisHair:
>> ^bareboards2:
Good point!
I concede that I am too jaded for my own good....
It's a sad day.
This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 3 Badge!
So, no hard feelings.
In reply to this comment by FlowersInHisHair:
Sorry to steal your thunder! :
In reply to this comment by luxury_pie:
>> ^FlowersInHisHair:
How hypocritical of @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/shinyblurry" title="member since January 21st, 2011" class="profilelink">shinyblurry to accuse someone else of having a "heart filled with poison". The ridiculous, hateful and archaic dogma of sin and judgement that you subscribe to is an immoral poison to the modern world, giving rise to absurd and damaging situations like the religious exception to this law.
Equating homosexuals with paedophiles is a cowardly trick of misdirection and a false analogy. They are not the same, and you know it - a consenting homosexual couple harms no-one at all, whereas a paedophile who molests a child causing emotional damage that ripples out into the child's later life and relationships. Your argument is empty.
Maaan. I wanted to do that :
They could've made it clearer, but they didn't say what you thought. What they did say isn't exactly wrong just not clear.
Fair enough that it's hardly worth counting UV vision in certain lens enhanced people, I just thought it was cool.
In reply to this comment by FlowersInHisHair:
>> ^oritteropo:
I think they mean that if you try to wrap the visible spectrum around a colour wheel, then it works for the red,green,blue,violet part and then stops working when you get to the magenta/pink/negative green part.
To quibble a little with your claim that anything out of the visisble spectrum is invisible, people who have had cataract surgery can see potentially light slightly outside the normal visible range (all right, not gamma rays, but still)... http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/605905
>> ^FlowersInHisHair:
The claim made in the video that we see all the non-visible wavelengths of light/EM radiation as pink is patently false. We know this because gamma rays aren't pink, they're invisible.
That's not what they're saying though. They are quite clearly saying that the vast area outside the tiny wavelengths we can see are perceived by human eyes as pink. If that were true, there would be so much light bouncing around that that we percieved as pink that we wouldn't be able to make anything else out.
And I quibble with your quibble: anything outside of the visible spectrum is invisible by definition, isn't it? The slight increase in the visible spectrum in a minority of the people who've ever had cataract surgery is hardly worth counting in this regard as it's not considered normal vision.